1.2 Honneth’s theory of recognition
Honneth (1995) argues that the
struggle for recognition should be at the centre of social conflicts. His
theory of recognition draws from amongst others Kant, Marx, Sorel, Sartre and
Mead, developing recognition as the moral basis of interaction in human conflicts,
and explains the relation between recognition and modernity. The major contribution
to Honneth’s theory of recognition is a re-reading of Hegel’s (1805/1983) Jena lectures. A theory of
recognition is important to this dissertation because recognition in my opinion
is a fundamental condition for legal protection in social work with the powerless,
weak and offended in a society.
Social work has to do with helping
people flourish, prosper and grow in unjust societies. Justice here has to do
with both the redistribution of power as with the recognition of ones identity
by others (Fraser 2002). Neither is sufficient alone. But combining justice and
a good life, doing both the right thing and what is good, is a difficult
assignment. Social work can in my opinion represent a struggle for the
recognition of fundamental rights given to individuals, given to them by
families, the judicial system, and society. Honneth argues that a person’s
identity is first realized through recognition. Without recognition, ones
identity is based on a false identity; an illusion. It is the fellowship with
others which sets the boundaries for recognition and therefore how ones reality
is conceived.
I agree with Høilund and Juul (2005)
who argue that recognition is suitable as an ethical foundation for social work.
The way we apprehend our identity and self-image is a more significant
condition for a good life then material goods, at least for those who are not
living in poverty which is threatening their existence. Following Honneth’s
theory of recognition (1996), the core in practical social work should then be
to contribute to a successful growth of personal identity. If recognition is
the universal condition for the development of a socially well functioning
identity, social work must in my opinion build on the recognition of the values
which the citizens take upon themselves. The phenomenon of shame studied here
has to be contextualized within the framework of social work practices that are
able to handle such negative identity traits as sexual abuse may leave on
people’s life. The atmosphere allowing narratives of shame to be let out in
this research may be created by the social work practices preceding my entering
of the scene. Honneths forms of recognition and misrecognition may well
represent some of the possible settings we may find these people in.
Kaare T. Pettersen
Reference:
No comments:
Post a Comment